Acute appendicitis: risk scores, imaging and the choice between antibiotics and appendicectomy
Acute appendicitis for FRCS (Gen Surg): Alvarado, AIR and Adult Appendicitis scores, imaging by patient group, antibiotics or surgery, and the appendix mass.
The classic story is visceral periumbilical pain that moves to the right iliac fossa as the parietal peritoneum becomes involved, with anorexia, nausea and a low-grade fever. Tenderness is greatest near McBurney’s point, a third of the way from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus, with guarding and percussion tenderness. A retrocaecal appendix may cause flank pain and a positive psoas sign. A pelvic appendix may cause diarrhoea, urinary frequency and tenderness only on rectal examination, with few abdominal signs.
The differential is widest in women of reproductive age: ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cyst rupture or torsion, and pelvic inflammatory disease. A pregnancy test is mandatory. Mesenteric adenitis, Meckel’s diverticulitis, terminal ileal Crohn’s disease, right-sided diverticulitis, ureteric colic and pyelonephritis all mimic appendicitis, and in older patients so does a caecal carcinoma. Medical causes, such as diabetic ketoacidosis and lower lobe pneumonia, should be excluded before anyone is listed for theatre.
Risk scores and what they are for
Scores do not make the diagnosis; they sort patients into groups. A low score identifies patients who can be observed, or discharged with safety-netting, without imaging. A high score in a young man may justify going straight to diagnostic laparoscopy. The intermediate group gains most from imaging. The 2020 WSES guidelines judge the Alvarado score not specific enough to diagnose appendicitis in adults, and recommend the AIR score and the Adult Appendicitis Score as the better clinical predictors.
The Alvarado score (1986), out of 10. A score of 4 or less makes appendicitis unlikely; 7 or more makes it likely.
Feature (MANTRELS)
Points
Migration of pain to the right iliac fossa
1
Anorexia
1
Nausea or vomiting
1
Tenderness in the right iliac fossa
2
Rebound tenderness
1
Elevated temperature (37.3 °C or more)
1
Leucocytosis (white cell count above 10 × 10⁹/L)
2
Shift to the left (neutrophils above 75%)
1
The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score adds C-reactive protein and grades the strength of peritoneal irritation. The Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) weights the neutrophil count and interprets CRP according to how long symptoms have lasted. Both outperform the Alvarado score in validation studies.
The RIFT study (BJS 2020) validated 15 models in more than 5,000 patients aged 16–45 with right iliac fossa pain in UK hospitals. The AAS performed best for women, identifying low risk at a score of 8 or less, and the AIR score performed best for men, at 2 or less. Women were more than twice as likely as men to have a normal appendix removed, which is why validated scores and selective imaging matter most for them.
Imaging by patient group
Children. Ultrasound first. CT is kept for doubt that would change management, because of the radiation dose.
Women of reproductive age. Ultrasound (transabdominal, with transvaginal if needed) also shows the ovaries and adnexa. CT is used if doubt persists.
Pregnancy. The WSES guidelines advise against diagnosing appendicitis on symptoms and signs alone. Ultrasound comes first, then MRI without gadolinium. A negative or inconclusive MRI does not exclude appendicitis when clinical suspicion is high.
Other adults, especially over 40. CT is the most accurate test and shows complications and other diagnoses, including caecal cancer. In the LOCAT trial (Kim, NEJM 2012) low-dose CT was non-inferior to standard-dose CT for the rate of negative appendicectomy.
Supportive CT features are a non-compressible appendix wider than about 6 mm, wall thickening and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and an appendicolith. Extraluminal gas, a fluid collection or a defect in the enhancing wall indicate complicated appendicitis.
Uncomplicated or complicated
Complicated appendicitis means gangrene, perforation, a phlegmon or an abscess. The distinction drives everything that follows: who can be offered antibiotics, whether antibiotics are needed after surgery and for how long. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades appendicitis on the same scale it uses for other emergency general surgery conditions.
AAST grading of acute appendicitis (Tominaga, 2016). It can be applied to clinical, imaging, operative or pathological findings.
AAST grade
Findings
I
Acutely inflamed appendix, intact
II
Gangrenous appendix, intact
III
Perforated appendix with local contamination
IV
Perforated appendix with a periappendiceal phlegmon or abscess
V
Perforated appendix with generalised peritonitis
Antibiotics or appendicectomy?
Laparoscopic appendicectomy remains the standard treatment. An antibiotics-first strategy is an evidence-based option for selected adults with imaging-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis. The choice is a shared decision: the patient trades a chance of avoiding an operation against a real chance of needing one later.
APPAC (Salminen, JAMA 2015) treated CT-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis without an appendicolith with intravenous ertapenem followed by oral antibiotics. Antibiotics did not meet the non-inferiority margin: about a quarter of patients had an appendicectomy within a year, and at five years (JAMA 2018) the cumulative figure was about two in five.
CODA (NEJM 2020) randomised 1,552 adults in the United States and included patients with an appendicolith. Antibiotics were non-inferior on health status at 30 days and patients missed fewer days of work. However, 29% had an appendicectomy by 90 days (41% of those with an appendicolith and 25% without), and complications were commoner with antibiotics, almost entirely among patients with an appendicolith.
A reasonable candidate for antibiotics is an adult with CT-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis, no appendicolith and no immunosuppression, who understands that the appendix may still need to come out. Older patients should know that a small proportion of apparent appendicitis is caused by an underlying neoplasm that antibiotics will not treat. The evidence in pregnancy and in children is more limited, and local policy applies.
Operative points
Laparoscopy is the default approach. It brings fewer wound infections, less pain and a quicker recovery than open surgery, and lets the surgeon look for gynaecological and other causes.
A normal-looking appendix. Practice varies. Removal avoids diagnostic confusion in future and treats early inflammation that cannot be seen, at the cost of a small risk of complications. Record the findings and the reasoning.
Complicated appendicitis. Suction of pus is as effective as irrigation, and routine drains do not reduce intra-abdominal abscess.
Antibiotics after surgery. None after an uncomplicated appendicectomy. After complicated appendicitis with good source control, a short fixed course is enough: in STOP-IT (Sawyer, NEJM 2015), about four days of antibiotics after source control for complicated intra-abdominal infection gave outcomes similar to longer, physiology-guided courses.
Histology. Always send the appendix. A neuroendocrine tumour under 1 cm is usually cured by appendicectomy and one over 2 cm needs a right hemicolectomy; between 1 and 2 cm the decision rests on mesoappendiceal invasion, the margin, vascular invasion and grade. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms go to a specialist multidisciplinary team because of the risk of pseudomyxoma peritonei.
The appendix mass and abscess
A patient who presents late with a tender mass in the right iliac fossa usually has a phlegmon or an abscess walled off by omentum and bowel. Initial treatment is non-operative: intravenous antibiotics, with percutaneous drainage of an abscess large enough to drain. Operating in the inflammatory phase is difficult and more often ends in an ileocaecal resection, so surgery is kept for patients who fail to settle or develop generalised peritonitis.
Routine interval appendicectomy fell out of favour because recurrence is uncommon. However, the Peri-APPAC trial (Mällinen, JAMA Surgery 2019) was stopped early after finding a high rate of appendiceal neoplasm after periappendicular abscess, all in patients over 40. Patients over 40 therefore need the colon and appendix assessed once the episode settles, by colonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging or by interval appendicectomy.
Special groups
Pregnancy. Appendicitis is the commonest non-obstetric surgical emergency in pregnancy, and perforation raises the risk of fetal loss, so the pregnancy must not delay the diagnosis. Laparoscopic appendicectomy can be performed in any trimester, with obstetric input.
Older patients present atypically, perforate more often and are more likely to have an underlying neoplasm. The threshold for CT is low.
Immunosuppressed patients may have few signs. Image early and favour surgery.
A 23-year-old woman has 24 hours of vomiting and diffuse abdominal pain. She is drowsy, with respiratory rate 30/min, pulse 124 bpm and BP 96/58 mmHg; the abdomen is diffusely tender with guarding. Venous gas: pH 7.08, bicarbonate 7 mmol/L, glucose 27 mmol/L, lactate 2.1 mmol/L. WCC 22 × 10⁹/L, amylase 210 U/L.
What is the most appropriate next step?
How sure are you?
Explanation
This is diabetic ketoacidosis presenting as an acute abdomen. Ketoacidosis itself causes abdominal pain, guarding, a neutrophil leucocytosis and a modest rise in amylase, and the abdominal signs track the severity of the acidosis. The priority is fluid resuscitation and fixed-rate insulin; pain that resolves as the acidosis corrects needs no further surgical work-up, whereas pain that persists once the pH has recovered, or that occurs with only mild acidosis, should prompt a search for a surgical precipitant. Immediate CT or operation in an unresuscitated patient is hazardous and usually unnecessary. Bicarbonate is not recommended. Reference: Joint British Diabetes Societies, Management of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults (2023); Umpierrez G and Freire AX, J Crit Care 2002.
In the RIFT study of UK patients aged 16–45, the Adult Appendicitis Score best identified low-risk women (a score of 8 or less) and the AIR score low-risk men (2 or less). The Alvarado score is widely known but less reliable for ruling appendicitis out.
Can uncomplicated appendicitis be treated with antibiotics alone?+
Yes, in selected adults with imaging-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis, after a shared decision. In CODA about three in ten patients needed an appendicectomy within 90 days, rising to 41% when an appendicolith was present.
Is an interval appendicectomy needed after an appendix mass?+
Not routinely to prevent recurrence. Patients over 40 do need the colon and appendix assessed, because the Peri-APPAC trial found a high rate of neoplasm after periappendicular abscess in that age group.
What imaging should be used for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy?+
Ultrasound first, then MRI without gadolinium if ultrasound is inconclusive. A negative or inconclusive MRI does not override strong clinical suspicion.
When does an appendiceal neuroendocrine tumour need a right hemicolectomy?+
When it is larger than 2 cm, and for some tumours of 1–2 cm with adverse features such as mesoappendiceal invasion, an involved margin, vascular invasion or a higher grade.
Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15(5):557–564.
Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 2008;32(8):1843–1849.
Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis — a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:114.
Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;313(23):2340–2348.
Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H, et al. Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;320(12):1259–1265.
CODA Collaborative. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2020;383(20):1907–1919.
Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2012;366(17):1596–1605.
Mällinen J, Rautio T, Grönroos J, et al. Risk of appendiceal neoplasm in periappendicular abscess in patients treated with interval appendectomy vs follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging: 1-year outcomes of the Peri-Appendicitis Acuta randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2019;154(3):200–207.
Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, et al. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med 2015;372(21):1996–2005.
Tominaga GT, Staudenmayer KL, Shafi S, et al. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading scale for 16 emergency general surgery conditions. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;81(3):593–602.
Written for revision in the FRCS (Gen Surg) style under our editorial standards. It is not clinical advice: always confirm against current guidance. Spotted an error? Tell us.